No. 19-528
John Wayne Scantlebury, et al. v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction article-iii collateral-attack criminal-procedure cross-border-tort due-process federal-officer-liability final-judgment minimum-contacts personal-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-11-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Whether criminal appeals from dismissals without prejudice are "final" under 28 U.S.C. §1291.
(2) Whether personal jurisdiction's minimum contacts analysis applies in criminal cases, as implied by th is Court's extending that analysis to taxation in the supervening decision in No. 18-457.
(3) Whether impact on the cross -border tort suit – a type of federal -officer liability being reviewed in No. 17-1678 – or dismissal for lack of personal -jurisdiction (i.e., showing a lack of contact ) satisfy Article III.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether criminal appeals from dismissals without prejudice are 'final' under 28 U.S.C. §1291
Docket Entries
2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 21, 2019)
2019-08-09
Application (19A155) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 18, 2019.
2019-08-08
Application (19A155) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 19, 2019 to October 18, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
John Scantlebury, et al.
Lawrence J. Joseph — Law Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent