No. 19-5281

Ronald Wesley Jiles v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2019-07-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility fair-trial fifth-amendment fifth-amendment-right jury-bias jury-instructions prejudice prosecutorial-misconduct self-incrimination
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a defendant's right to exercise his Fifth Amendment right was prejudiced by the prosecution's comments on it during closing arguments

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHILE IN OPEN QOURT, COMMENTED ON BY THE PROSECUTION TO THE JURY DURING Petitiener says, YESi DAMAGED THE DEFENDANT'S IMAGE IN THE MIMDS OF THE JURY, ULTIMATELY Patitioner says, YESi ” ‘ WHETHER A DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO EXERCISE HIS FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT WHILE : IN OPEN COURT, COMMENTED ON BY THE PROSECUTION TO THE JURY DURING CLOSING WHETHER THE JUDGES DECISION TO ADMIT EVIDENCE IRRELEVANT TO THE CHARGE DAMAGED THE DEFENDANT'S IMAGE IN THE MINDS OF THE JURY, ULTIMATELY PREJUDICING THE DEFENDANT?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Ronald Jiles
Ronald Wesley Jiles — Petitioner
Ronald Wesley Jiles — Petitioner