No. 19-5283
Kyle Jason Korte v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment good-faith-exception illinois-v-krull improper-application judicial-precedent law-enforcement search-and-seizure statutory-interpretation valid-law
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the 'good faith exception' outlined in Illinois v. Krull extend to circumstances where the statute remains valid but was improperly applied?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Does the “good faith exception” outlined in J/linois v. Krull 480 U.S. 340 (1987) extend to circumstances where the statute, rather than being “subsequently invalidated”remains validbut was improperly applied? Can there be good faith if the law is settled? 2
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Kyle Korte
H. Dean Steward — H. Dean Steward, APC, Petitioner
H. Dean Steward — H. Dean Steward, APC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent