No. 19-5285

Daniel Luke Meier v. Amanda M. Berger, et al.

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2019-07-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 42-U.S.C.-1983 42-usc-1983 5th-amendment circuit-court civil-rights civil-rights-42-usc-1983 constitutional-rights default-judgment due-process property property-rights state-law
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Circuit Court err in failing to complete the default process against Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company under color of state law and violate of the Plaintiff's federally protected due process rights by depriving the Plaintiff of 'property' he is entitled to under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and due process under the 5 and 14s Amendments to the constitution?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the Circuit Court err in failing to complete the default process against Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company under color of state law and violate of the Plaintiff's federally protected due process rights by depriving the Plaintiff of “property” he is entitled to under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and due process under the 5 and 14s Amendments to the constitution? Did the Circuit Court err in allowing Allstate to proceed after a default was entered on the docket and the Judge arbitrarily blocked the clerk from entering the default judgment in violation of federally recognized due process rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983 and due process under the 5th and 14* Amendments to the constitution? Did the Circuit Court err in abusing it’s discretion in not requiring a principled decision and allowing a 2.116 (c)(7) to be filed even though there . was no final order, motion was not in responsive pleading, federally . recognized fraud upon the court was admitted and threshold of serious . impairment of body function was always met and surpassed depriving the Plaintiff of “property” he is entitled to under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and due process under the 5 and 14 Amendments to the constitution? i No. ee IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DANIEL LUKE MEIER— PETITIONER VS. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CORP. AND AMANDA MEGAN BERGER —RESPONDENT(S) : ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS EASTERN DISTRICT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI The petitioner, Daniel Luke Meier, respectfully petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment and opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals Eastern District. Michigan Supreme Court denial of leave was April 30, 2019. ii

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-22
Waiver of right of respondent Allstate Property and Casualty Ins. Corp. to respond filed.
2019-08-14
Brief of respondent Amanda M. Berger in opposition filed.
2019-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Allstate Property and Casualty Ins. Corp.
Byran R. PadgettZausmer, P.C., Respondent
Byran R. PadgettZausmer, P.C., Respondent
Amanda M. Berger
Darwin Leroy Burke Jr.RUGGIRELLO, VELARDO, NOVARA & VER BEEK, P.C., Respondent
Darwin Leroy Burke Jr.RUGGIRELLO, VELARDO, NOVARA & VER BEEK, P.C., Respondent
Daniel L. Meier
Daniel L. Meier — Petitioner
Daniel L. Meier — Petitioner