No. 19-5288
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus jurisdiction standing
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the false complaint and indictment in violation of Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : + Falae comple int and indictmett in violotion af rile-TRlaqotte Gh al
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus/prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2019-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-17
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 22, 2019)