No. 19-5297
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-claim criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-law judicial-review jurisdiction post-conviction second-amendment sentencing standard-of-review state-court sufficiency-of-evidence unreasonable-application
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Arizona Supreme Court abused its discretion by dismissing the Petition for Special Action and Motion for Stay?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; Yomedncs, Acvzona Supreme Cour douse Ws discretion ‘oy dismissiq ; Mae Fesnon Ler Special ackion and Motion Tor Stoy? 4 V Wetingy Ane Sagerier Coork wos without yurisdiction ro render ‘wdgment oeecveng Sentence and, whether Me Tughe oF poccee court in’ iy ONCe was who \wrvsadiction® 40 ral MAS BEN AYond a ceasonable doulst NON & catonal Avies of facts Ory Seal Veyury nd Courd 5) Soult KH Count |) Ag§ A560, causing OA wit o deadly Weaeen § Aq 2 of 20 C , ad ‘
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2019)