No. 19-5300

Fremo Santana v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination guideline-range ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-proceedings
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether defense counsel's performance was constitutionally ineffective for erroneously miscalculating petitioner's guideline range which was the deciding factor for petitioner to accept the government's plea

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. WHETHER DEFENSE COUNSEL'S PERFORMANCE WAS CONSTITUTIONALLY INEFFECTIVE FOR ERRONEOUSLY MISCALCULATING PETITIONER'S GUIDELINE RANGE WHICH WAS THE DECIDING FACTOR FOR PETITIONER TO ACCEPT THE GOVERNMENT'S PLEA. II. WHETHER THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE PROHIBITS THE ADMISSION OF TESTIMONIAL STATEMENTS THAT ARE NOT SUBJECT TO CROSS-EXAMINATION DURING THE SENTENCING PROCEEDINGS. t (4)

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)

Attorneys

Fremo Santana
Fremo Santana — Petitioner
Fremo Santana — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent