No. 19-5303
Mario Benitez-Pineda v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law constitutional-challenge constitutional-law controlled-substances criminal-law due-process federal-law penalty-provision sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 21 U.S.C. § 841 et. seq., is unconstitutional because it contains no penalty provision?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether 21 U.S.C. § 841 et. seq., is unconstitutional because it contains no penalty provision ? € AJ o .
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent