No. 19-5304
Michael Paul Puzey v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 38-usc-7253 appellate-review article-iii civil-procedure constitutional-error due-process judicial-procedure jurisdictional-standard legal-interpretation procedural-review standing statutory-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Appellate Court committed a Manifest error by Failing to adhere to its obligations and duty under Article III, subsection 2, and 38 U.S.C. 7253 to Satisfy itself that Subject-matter Jurisdiction was Proven and existed in Petitioner case ab initio
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |. Whether the Appellate Cavrt+ committed a Manifest OF Constitutional error by Failing +o ddhere to (Fs obligations and duty under Article tI subsection a. and 38 USC. 453 to Satisfy itselt that Ati | ay Subsection Q. subjectmatter Jurisdiction wag Proven and existed in Petitioner case ab initio 2
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent