No. 19-5311
Ivaylo Dodev v. Bank of New York Mellon
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review arizona-court-of-appeals arizona-rules-of-civil-procedure civil-procedure civil-procedure,eviction,dismissal,arizona-rules-o criminal-law due-process eviction eviction-proceedings federal-criminal-procedure hobbs-act judicial-discretion rule-41 second-amendment united-states-v-davis voluntary-dismissal Whether Mr. Burke's § 924(c) conviction is invalid
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One abused its discretion by not ruling on the applicability of Rule 41(a)(1) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure to eviction proceedings
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1. Whether the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One abused its discretion by not ruling on the applicability of Rule 41(a)(1) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure to eviction proceedings, after Respondent used Rule 41(a)(1) to _ voluntarily dismiss two prior eviction proceedings identical to the underlying action.
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-01
Waiver of right of respondent Gerald J. Ricke to respond filed.
2019-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Gerald J. Ricke
C. Adam Buck — Radix Law, PLC, Respondent
Ivaylo Dodev
Ivaylo Tsvetanov Dodev — Petitioner