No. 19-5321
John R. Collins v. Tim Shoop, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability due-process factual-innocence mcquiggin-exception mcquiggin-v-perkins miller-el-v-cockrell no-trial-no-guilty-plea presumption-of-innocence procedural-rules
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the "actual innocence" exception/gateway in McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383 (2013) require new evidence of innocence when there has never been a trial or a plea of guilty?
Is the "presumption of innocence" equivalent to "actual innocence" when there has been no trial and no guilty plea?
Should a Certificate of Appealability issue under Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003) so this issue may be briefed on the merits?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the 'actual innocence' exception/gateway in McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383 (2013) require new evidence of innocence when there has never been a trial or a plea of guilty?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-19
Waiver of right of respondent Tim Shoop, Warden to respond filed.
2019-03-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 23, 2019)
Attorneys
John R. Collins
John Patrick Parker — Petitioner
Tim Shoop, Warden
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent