Whether the courts overlooked federal law and the U.S. Constitution when they overlooked the 4th Amendment exclusionary rule, the 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination, and the requirements of Federal Rule 3 for a sworn complaint

No question identified. : ‘ No. JQR9QG ; IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES RoShacd Whitehecd prose — PETITIONER . (Your Name) vs. Mark TOch — RESPONDENT(S) ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO Untreh state court oF APPCALS Foe The ELEVENTH Cikc uit (NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE) PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (Your Name) Okeechobee Cotrictionnt Tastituken SYURON. £. 168th st (Address) okeechobos FlacidA 349972. (City, State, Zip Code) ——_Ndwre (Phone Number) > an QUESTZON.ONE ———--—| an aW__OF_the_ united ae Constitubion ——~-—___-} Ss. overlooked, in Hila tion___oF_the__4"" can not be used_ia_e_criming ——— TROiL+ _Aganst..the victim oF the iWegal__S@atcth and an eizuce US. UV Perkins 349 F.2d U5; the petitioner fps plotetted__by the _USCAS5 USCA AG). DOYLE VOWED, GS CF 8H a wn UESTTON TWO. ae Whether _cul__courts __. Constitutional jaw when they_overlooked the E:64h__amendmenk_ a Wielation.__The S* amendment —f Commenting_.drectly or W0_testiPy Grikein V ealipornin 360 us Gog! Darden. ——--——__ Jv wainwright 1F#_U.S. 16% quoting. Denney wv Dechristo. _ oro. Ylo U.S 632} State DIGUTITO YO! ad Nag uz 396 us 18 —— pa. QUEST$on_THREe whether @ll_courts ovetleaked ———_-] Constitution. _Wwhed__They overlooked Federal___Rule 2andy we ee es . ja a —-()\-——— which state” Provide _that_and_written sworn Complaint Setting the. offen ~~ uv U.S. 3357 US. 490! 78 S5.c4/OUS) oP SO PU GOCA Klein 143 SUPP G30. 639-639} | i ~33/__E_ Supp _II#A.; 1934 the Federal a -Courts._requite__ Strict compliance with the feguifement.. —_. HOF —Rute._.3.__5ee_ Brown._v_Daggan_399 F Supp QOF OP af Lp the. Case .ON a the_cover.__page