Whether a prisoner has due process and equal protection under the Constitution

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a prisoner has due process and equal protection under the Constitution when a guard deliberately, willfully and ma; " liciously seizes a prisoner's legal and religious property, while working directly for the government under color of state lau in ; his individual capacity? Then, while directly under that power : and on that same day accuses offender of a major case then is allowed by superiors ta destroy the property that is the basis for the major case, ; 2. Whether a prisoner has due process and equal protection under the Constitution to call witnesses in his defense when issued a false, quota filling case that prisoner will automatically be found guilty of without his constitutional right to call witnesses on his behalf and to have those witnesses present? And whether superiors who oversee this biased, completely unfair process should be held accountable in their individual capacities and not granted sovereign immunity? 3. Whether a prisoner has equal protection under the Constitution when Defendants who are superiors and personally and directly involved in their individual capacities do not address and manage subordinates illegal behavior? 4. whether a prisoner has equal protection under the Constitution when the property is legal material while trying to appeal to this very court, The Supreme Court Of The United States, causing "actual injury". Legal property and religious property was , not frivolous and insequential. Actions by Defendants directly (i) a ££ _——— i ii i — — —_— hindered, impeded and burdened Plaintiff's constitutional right to file in this very court, The Supreme Court,