Whether petitioner was denied reasonable and/or adequate opportunity of assisting counsel during appeal process

ESTIONS PRESETED YAUPEUER PETITIONER WAS DENTED H EASOMMBLE And/og La QUITE UNO OF ASST SUNG OF COUNSEL DURE) Aiea) | OSC CON ee SN Roctepry(s) 6 a I d. \ WHET PETIATONE? WAS DENTED EXCECTINE ASSTSTUNG _ be em conse HL AFANCE TO OBST ALE A) NON. | ERS NAD Wy GROUNDS AS To SHAE wares © Syineuse | STATE Saez Ered PLRSONAL owl EDae ‘bso PRAEMENT To? ADNZSS TON. OF POTD, BUONSTSENT ws MENT UKDER SETDON 729 cuts S/Us-1Ol(c)(2) & | — Se Ce es poet, — fl) WAEUEC PETE ONE? WAS DEED ERPECTCVE ASCE STN le ZO Na J ANS Post Co TON, COONSED Fog, ——pausanas 2 WG 2MPRUR USE, OF SPECT a NERVE OGhrp ye D) WAETUEC “ME SPECIAL, ENTERRODATORY WAS TL Pewee | ORM SAME ZX EASUED To CELATE To AN UUTeMaTZ Tsu) ee i | _ —_— 7 LIST OF T ne Bel ALL, PAR APPEAR TUL, CAPTION CE TUE Cas ee _ ‘lo TUE COVER PAGE. oe |} Av. Taemes DO NOT APPEAR TA TUE CAPTION OF ee THE CASE, OK TUE Cover Pace, Ke UIsT SF AN on IPACTTES TO ME PROEEDING DLTUE ColprT WHOSE a i SMENT TS TUG SUB UECT OF “Ws PETITION TS i I | i TARLE OF CONTEXT wee a BEY : ONSTITUTIONL AMD STATUTORY PealtstoKs WoL 73S ! EAS OVS) Toe GRANT NIA WE WATT 10 Tn) 20 ae | INDEX To APPENDICES APeEDTx AL — DECaASTON OF ME APCELAKTE. COURT a DATNOLS Tost DESTELST [eet 6 —_DECTSTon, OF THE Comensr COURT OF . | \OUNTY , DLE lox