Can the District Court Deny to Abide with the Supreme Court rulings on Restitution?

QUESTION PRESENTED Under this Court’s precedent in Mary Capri Vs. US Attorney Financial Litigation Unit. The Petitioner was Released from Probation in 4/2016 WITHOUT Violations, from her Mail Fraud Charges in 2/2005. Still Homeless, Since 4/2013 Living Between The Hased House in Aurora, I] and PADS Homeless Sites Assisted by Churches. Living on the Streets for 4 Years Without Community Ties. Apartment from 5/2017-7/2018 lease was up and did not have moving funds for another apartment. Waiting Anxiously for her Tax Refund Prepared by Liberty Tax Services, of Aurora Illinois. 100% of the Refund was forfeited. Leaving Mary Without Enough Funds to Obtain Another Apartment. Supreme Court Rulings; The Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause is an incorporated protection applicable to the States pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause . Was Denied for Mary Capri, as the Judgment States, . "Capri should raise any issues she has with her supervised release before the judges assigned to her criminal case. See Capri v. Zammuto, No. 13 C 8666, Doc. 19 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 16, 2014) (dismissing case brought by Capri raising questions about her criminal conviction and the manner of her supervision, noting that she could not challenge the validity of her convictions in a separate civil suit and should raise issues with her supervision before the judges overseeing her supervision). Because amendment would be futile, the Court dismisses Capri’s complaint with prejudice, denies her motion to proceed IFP, and denies any remaining pending motions as ; moot. .etal ' ALSO STATED. . She cannot now, many years later, raise issues with the restitution order in a civil proceeding against the US Attorney’s Financial Litigation Unit. Nor could she pursue a claim under 3 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to challenge the restitution component of her sentence or use a writ of coram nobis to do so.etal” Can the District Court Deny to Abide with the Supreme Court rulings on Restitution? Is this Considered a Miscarriage of Justice?