No. 19-5383
Christopher Stacy v. United States
Tags: case-law certiorari criminal-law criminal-procedure judicial-review mens-rea rehaif-standard rehaif-v-united-states remand statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-precedent vacatur
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019)
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019). i
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-10-15
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 588 U. S. ___ (2019).
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-08-30
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)
Attorneys
Christopher Stacy
Andrew Lee Adler — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Andrew Lee Adler — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent