No. 19-5387
Shevaun E. Browne v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cautionary-instruction criminal-procedure evidence guilty-plea habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions plea-bargaining sixth-amendment third-circuit trial-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether certiorari review should be granted where the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a cautionary instruction after evidence of Kevin Fessale's guilty plea was presented at trial
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE THIRD CIRCUIT AFFIRMED THE DISTRICT COURT’S RULING THAT TRIAL COUNSEL WAS NOT INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO REQUEST A CAUTIONARY INSTRUCTION AFTER EVIDENCE OF KEVIN FESSALE’S GUILTY PLEA WAS PRESENTED AT TRIAL. i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-02
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to respond filed.
2019-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Shevaun E. Browne
David Jonathon Joffe — Joffe Law, P.A., Petitioner
David Jonathon Joffe — Joffe Law, P.A., Petitioner
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent