No. 19-5388
Marquis Travell Edwards v. United States
Tags: certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure discovery due-process government-misconduct habeas-corpus pre-indictment-delay preindictment-delay prosecutorial-misconduct tactical-advantage
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals should have granted a certificate of appealability (COA)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals should have granted a certificate of appealability (COA) because reasonable jurists would disagree whether Petitioner was entitled to discovery to prove his claim that the government’s failure to indict him for racketeering offenses until he was 21 years old -for offenses that took place when he was only 16 and 17 years old -was to gain an improper tactical advantage, thus requiring dismissal of the charges for preindictment delay? i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Marquis Travell Edwards
Verna Jean Wefald — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Verna Jean Wefald — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent