Whether the First Circuit's op/order affirming Petitioner's sentence and conviction finding no plain error when the United States commented on Petitioner's silence as to specific areas which were not addressed in Petitioner's direct testimony warrants certiorari?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the First Circuit's op/order affirming . ; Petitioner's sentence and conviction finding no plain error when the United States commented on Petitioner's : . silence as to specific areas which were not addressed , in Petitioner's direct testimony warrants certiorari? 2. Whether the First Circuits ruling on Petitioner's Rule 29 motion should be remanded for a new trial 2 . 3. Whether Appellate Counsel was ineffective for Filing a direct appeal on Petitioner's behalf without : reviewing the evidence. Specifically, the First Circuit pointed out "Curiously, unlike the jury and us, Charriez's ; . Appellate Counsel has not looked at the photos 2? See App A. :