No. 19-5408
Gregory Daniels v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-procedure civil-procedure court-dismissal dismissal due-process fourth-circuit jurisdiction legal-error notice-of-appeal standard-of-review standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred as a matter of law by dismissing petitioner's notice of appeal
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW A. WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW BY DISMISSING PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL. i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Gregory Daniels
Samuel Bayness Winthrop — Winthrop & Gaines Messick, PLLC, Petitioner
Samuel Bayness Winthrop — Winthrop & Gaines Messick, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent