Whether the actions of Nawis County Sheriff's Department violate the constitutional and statutory rights of petitioner Brady A. Daniel under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article 1 Section 9 of the Texas Constitution, and under Art. 38.23 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , C1) Dip THE ACTIONS OF nawis COUNTY SHERIEES DEPARTMENT VIOLATE THE (oNeTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY RIGHTS oF PeTITioned Bravy A.DANEL LINDER THE FOURTH) FIFTH SIXTH Aw FoorrecnTH Amenoments To THE : LINITED STATES ConSTETUTION . amicte 1 SECA OF THE TEMS ConstITUTION. Ano UINDE2 ART. 33.23 d IH. oF THE TEKHS Cone OF Cam. Procsmane. (Z.\ WEATHER “THE WUARLENTLESs ENTIe INTO THE FRoreety of PetiTioNe Vows ARREST AND Indictment ? (3) HEATHER THE ADVICE oF “TRIAL MT IORNEY Naemeo $ee\uneen , Petitioner To Pler Cult OF AGB. ASSANLT “To As Ofen Plea, Wurth NO CAP. S44 Plato UNnee DueEss ‘CoWuect” C4) WHEATHEZ CouNsets DEFICIENT: PeRrouMance OreJuoicen PETITIONEL LWIHEN TKIAL Comer Recewencen THe FACT THAT THE Sur. WoTION Couto Be LurGen WY THE DEFENCE CPREvIOUSIY FLED MoTion To Supers ) Counsel CaiLeo To URGE OR ACT On. | (5) WoltaTHac A BRADY VioLATIoN EXIST LUKE State LotTH HELD WATEUAL EVIDENCE THAT DETITIONER LAS AREESTED VOCTHHOUT WAddenT IN ViOlLATION OF FouteenTH Améenomenrt. (6) WHEAT? THERE WAS A CONFLICT OF INTERAST of ATioenet /ClieNT C1) WteAT#HGe CouRT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS DENIAL OF STATE WRT [07 | LAS EITHER CONTRARY To OR “UNREASONADLE APPLICATION OF CLEARLY ESTABLISHED FEDERAL Law, AS Decinen BY THE USSweecme Couer, o2 THAT THE STATE COURTS UNRCASONABLY DETER INGO THE Facts OF THE Case. OEE 26 USCS 2254 (Cd) (i) LIST OF BarTiES , Rraby DANIEL PETITIONER . g VS. ane eel -C Lorie Davis, oirecror § TEYAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, . : CORRECTIONAL INSTLTUTION DIVISION. Q , RESPONDENT 4 STATES DIRECT TESTIMONY Pagnés. , ‘ANGELA SKELTON CL pialFeieno/victim a * DEPUTY SHERIFE GREEN * STATE-TROOPER WHEELER Derense Dinect TESTIMONY PaRTI¢S. . PATT! WEBB — ANOTHER , ~ PAT DANIEL FATHER ARN DANIEL SECOND COUSIN VATTORNEGN FoR STATE: SAM CG.Mos§S—_ ATTORNEN FOR DEFENDANT: PATRICK HOWARD JUDGE: Nonotasie: STEPHEN ELLIS, APPELLATE ATIORNEN « EMILY ANILLER APPELLATE JUDGE: CHier susTICe ROSE, TusTices Pemiseeton AND Fel On RE! ©3-15-00058-CR3 BRADN ALAN DANIEL V. THE STATE OF Tévas. THRD CouRT OF APPEALS AUSTIN TX Gi).