Can convictions and sentences imposed by a State Trial Court without Constitutional or statutory subject-matter jurisdiction be used to enhance a 24-year prison sentence?

No question identified. : ; oH | QULSTIONS PR D | Can convictions auc) sexton im pose by = a Stabe Trial Couct vitor Constibztroun| | ow Sratutony sub \edwatt A Juaishichio’ luc to an Unconstitadions| guilty plea | be usta) to WMeAKCORAL, Deon OA | 24 years Po . | . | ; | | | | | | | } _| ; st_or Pacries | lea the ates of xl pastes > appewis tn ae caption | on he CKe on 4 COU Page, , | | | a | | | [a | Ce [a | | | —_ | | | ia . ral s | . TABLE. OF CouTenTs | . (9) LOPwiows Beow | . | ISussneo |e Ouge & staTuNoRN PPsvbiws | stavenewt OF THe Cust } ~F _[Reaso FoR Geary THe WAT 2G fences 30 | | \ARER TO APPEODKES ; APPLOD I & DecisQ0 OF TK CLEeT OF APPEALS. | OF CeoRsia : . lectern B_—dDedsine OF “ME SUlsan coUT OF Gime Coury no EOWA C Pardo OF The SUPIEME COUCr OF . | CeOACHA DENY PIKCMEMOAHEY REvItLo : | CoEong ty ewe REccns(DegaTiOvo lp gerd E10 Sy 1ST Guile, DEA Taweryt| Seger, Code Gus Corby | Ati | ts Bie Decor oF “fe Cond of Ropes of Clecsena onencdin BD Vedstor oP re Supslian Gok fy Gurney Coutty Aogeeda C* Decision of te Seydeme Goud fy, FJemnojia , Powys Ro Qe win Di Orda De. Supe Cond of Creseoyin — i Denying Wecontdeusrion , | | | | We aN : __ TABLE OF AterhoarTies | ___\ PGs Deleon ve Fulamaitt ‘Wiser 1240 iat) 4,29 Be id ve Rirdler Jos bi2 Gwe) 29 Bik we v. Raa G4 ser 201 Cia) 12 ; Dowlti, v. Aleoant ‘84 Ser HOY 9A) 448 4410 W121 19 | LO” 4 LIB 919, 20,21,23,24 Berishyo v. Stuagl TUS 5 29%, (ans) i2 Bed US Go sere me) ups v. Cabos Sis Bat Lisu#) 23 : wo v.US pesos) ayy 22D : esuell v. Ged huche 32s B22 LAND 24 |Raiaths of Peathins oo , | IFisRe vs Ravers HEsoyss Ose) 24 Flew uw. Aton as sass] (2m) 12 | ord -v. Ceergia Ws gro Lise) 24 wt Vv. Chapaga 120 5a 173% —_ Caas) __2024,2% v. Skusli (Sr net ve) to Neynca ve Rothudly Jouser igo (eo 22 \Kerchwos v. ULS. utsasey i) 22 xv, Remna 122. dcr OFF ro) 24 2b I Caedty v. US 84 KT Nbly (ABA) 1© IN Dorald) ye Chy oA Wos@ 320 (Que) 28 fae v [Pes) , Nema v. New ead Glo sa 24) Cie) _ Ib Yi chigan uv. SeReon Jol set _14bY Ciget) 10 Mallee vy. Udilbar esc lel (iste) 20 urcyy v. Caasier — {olo xT 202% _ C80) 24 “(Neo Thorough baed 1383800 Fel C208) 2% Moesenwwe Assoc. Mey v. UGK Noes v. Adan 5ST SOY BIHY (i908) 267 Del vw. Thonpso 2 8 L18 ay) 2b [Preke ve Kale _ NBS SF (ae) le Dubie Libity Commer of » SOI YYylo (195) 2lo Cantoaain v. US Qesher-Mikinv. US [Bese iedt ante) 2h Sertoddle y. Jno Youd Gust 44s Gist) (2 is yi YEongin BtSH dg | se) 267 Sted Go. vCities & NB se J008 Cet) 20. US. ve Bare [OSD 36% Li) “j@20 ~ sv. Cote taser 138) (2m) 26 ~ US v. Dome wa Denes rys@_2333 (Qawa) _4 UIP JS. vGeoegin Puslic 63 50 39% Qs) 2s Si v.Gonaiee-hoper ws 2537 ape) 2? l enon. Nhs acausclts IZESCK 1844 C2ea) 14,23, 2% Lorscoish Dept. oP Neo _2oHF Ce) 2.2 Vv. Schawicl _ [it Cum _BS. 4D 26 rectus) Cou iRell_v. Dain CH04 HF SIG C206) 13 Sher v Dulloh RRS TBE Ge ED IB Cont Ve p aN Autor = I | | pol STATE OF (cEORCOIA ~ | | (Pcs) lAencd v. Howeston UNp Sé2d 3S _C 2607) | [Baisden vy. Site (20 Sid Buy (2055) it Bass v. State 401 Stzd Pot (200) 22 Mazewis v. Ste 585 SEA Foo (2p) 18 Baar v. Mone WA stad Boy UG) ASIF Hove State 54@ 520 Bor Cer) No . . —. Cully vo Scwkadtt 34 SE 1BL Lea) zz Dasils ve Stoke A\#A20¢9 (2018) He, 26 . ercon v. Tawaten UPR SB 7 (20H i+ urd . Din v. Dir bo S&. $90 Cw). 2 | [Dixon v. State BOB ew bse Bot) ? . | Foskes ve Date SH SUA Bor (200%) iF Festus ve Stave BHR LS) __C2000) 18 oda v. Chy of Alone BY St? 63977 (20%) 2% calmer, ve Dav’ 2BFSEY Dv a) Ws 2&7 en. Stare wo tte #8 Gas) Coisson v. Gleason wes 27 Lge) 12 [ aun Obie (of SEA) | 2 (20%) re | = fide vy Ste Plo S22 | (20100) Ho in _ reget vy. SERS 449 5228 FeO (2018) 24.22 a (fs) i fre mad oh SMA dw) Bus St Bos (209) 1B Soliton vu. Smt (2b 5&2 YO Came) Ik hereune ve ACLavgh lia Polo St2/ BO? (208) Ly15— Detn v.. Stare Gv St2? 497 (200) 22 Nazanto v. Shia lo SR 10% (208) Ite, 2F Philp v. Shae #2) Sua.214 (220) 22. ahscy ue Stk Hay See Ye (200) 18,257 [Reonesy v. Sth. (40 5024 BYO (2210) 24 Sendieg v. Vides (06