Whether the Fourth Court of Appeals' legal analysis of the nexus between evidence about a murder investigation and information in the Petitioner's cell phone, as alleged in the affidavit in support of a search warrant for the Petitioner's cell phone violates well-established federal search warrant precedent, and nullifies this Court's landmark holding in Riley v. California, 573 U.S.___ (2014)?

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Fourth Court of Appeals’ legal analysis of the nexus between evidence about a murder investigation and information in the Petitioner’s cell phone, as alleged in the affidavit in support of a search warrant for the Petitioner’s cell phone violates well-established federal search warrant precedent, and nullifies this Court’s landmark holding in Riley v. California, 573 U.S.___ (2014)? ll