No. 19-5417
Travis Wayne Bentley v. Oklahoma
Response RequestedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-courts federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdiction native-american-rights standing
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-07-08
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state court had jurisdiction to convict the petitioner under the Major Crimes Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : idindectin gue 2 Chochew dean pr peeled. f 4 sede delisen Chechaw Gebisrd and We bailed, sual : 2 Whe, Abide T, pacts 99M US Conatchulin, denuee trim fusrdietin t ancy Sty chen a pant Cp
Docket Entries
2020-08-10
MANDATE ISSUED.
2020-08-10
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-07-09
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>McGirt</i> v. <i>Oklahoma</i>, 591 U. S. ___ (2020).
2020-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/8/2020.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-02
Reply of petitioner Travis W. Bentley filed.
2019-11-25
Brief of respondent Oklahoma in opposition filed.
2019-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 25, 2019.
2019-10-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 24, 2019 to November 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-24
Response Requested. (Due October 24, 2019)
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)
Attorneys
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent