No. 19-5418
Walter Lee Brown v. James Deal, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fifth-amendment free-speech jurisdiction land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings standing takings-clause
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit the government from requiring a property owner to pay a fee to obtain a permit to use their own property
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Bema _ TI QOaanz—ofr /Yopoen BRRE | Wd (7S leis jay4 Vewyug PPAR Mortar POR 2 CERT Peasy Gx Appenta, Lip abe 7S 1M CapyplicWT PRIAR, ALLL S/d « fo. ee Cur ANe HER CaeR7T go Apres ARO), My uN WwW Série Conlliexz— Wi 77) PED RISER RA Of SHOT 74{) IASC 2 ,
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent Deal, Warden to respond filed.
2019-07-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)
Attorneys
Deal, Warden
Andrew Alan Pinson — Office of the Georgia Attorney General, Respondent
Walter L. Brown
Walter Lee Brown — Petitioner