No. 19-5420

Kendrick Terrell v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plain-error prior-charges sentence-enhancement sentencing sentencing-calculation sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Rights were violated

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether the Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Rifghts were violated by plain error made in calculating Petitioner's sentence, . and the humerous ways that Petitioner's Counsel was ineffective assistance of Counsel in which the United States Constitution guarantees. _Ir. whether or not if the Petitioner's Eight Amendment Rights : were violated when the Government enhanced Petitioner's sentence by using prior charges in which Petitioner did not serve one year or more in prison. . : Bott Til... Whether. increasing Petitioner's sentencing Guidelines Toe : from 10-to-life,.to 20-to-life, which left Petitioner with a -longer sentence after Petitioner asked Counsel to file an appeal. > ~ > . ; :

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)

Attorneys

Kendrick Terrell
Kendrick Terrell — Petitioner
Kendrick Terrell — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent