No. 19-5422

Michael A. Webb v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: adam-walsh-act adam-walsh-child-protection-and-safety-act constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-prosecution double-jeopardy ineffective-assistance plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; 1) Was petitioner, Michael A. Webb, subjective to ineffective assistance of counsel or deficient representation by defense counsel in a criminal ; prosecution? ae 2) Was petitioner, Michael A. Webb, subjective to illegal sentence in imposition . of the totality of the combined sentence(s) above the sentence guidelines and sentence neccessary for deterrance? . ; 3) Was petitioner, Michael A. Webb, lead into ambiguous plea agreement a by and through deficient represeitation of defense counsel with agreement with the respondent? 4) Was petitioner, Michael A. Webb, subjective to double jeopardy in ‘the sentencing for his crime? : ; , _— 5) was petitioner, Michael A. Webb, constitutional rights violated in a conviction and sentencing of his criminal prosecution? : 6). Is Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act unconstitutional as : enacted by Congress? : , > .

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)

Attorneys

Michael A. Webb
Michael A. Webb — Petitioner
Michael A. Webb — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent