Whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the trial court's judgment that this was an actual arraignment/indictment proceeding rather than a trial on the merits

No question identified. : ISSUES FOR REVIEW ISSUE NUMBER ONE: Appeal Counsel only raised one point of error. It was a question regarding the Complainant. Tnat she nad been nearly raped by someone else two months prior to the incident. ISSUE NUMBER TWO: Appeal Counsel would not raise a claim of Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel on Direct Appeal. Because this was an actual arraignment hearing trial. And that Appeal Counsei should have raised that this was an actual arraignment trial/Indicting proceeding. ISSUE NUMBER THREE: The Court of Appeals modified tie triai courts judgment in the effects of enhancements that proved that this was oniy an-arraignment trial hearing. ISSUE NUMBER FOUR: The-.court of appeals affirms that a Grandjury found the Petitioner guilty at the -actual that is a Indictment Proceeding and have just now Indicteu the Petitioner of Aggravated Sexuai Assault of a Chiid as what was actually read in the Indictment from this actual Granajury. ai NAME OF THE PARTIES Petitioner Antonio Rasnhawne Carr TDCS Ic # 02165207 : Connally Unit 699 F.M. 632 Keneay, Texas 78119 Res ondant Ken Paxton Attorney Generali of Texas . P.O. Box 12548 ; Austin, Texas 78711-2548 . aii