Whether instructional error occurred in a way that conflicts with the Supreme Court's clearly established harmless-error precedents

No question identified. : L,, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, FEDERAL. DISTRICT COURT, AND STATE TRIAL COURT ALL HAVE DECIDED AN IMPORTANT FEDERAL QUESTION WITH RESPECT 70 WHETHER INSTRUCTIONAL ERROR OCCURRED IN A YAY THAT CONFLICTS WITH THIS COURT’S CLEARLY ESTABLISHED HARMLESS~ERROR PRECEDENTS., ; A. The Courts Artitrarity Picked A Period It Believed The Victim No Longer Posed A Thneat To Petitioner. an B., The Counts Impeanissibly Focused On The Sufficiency O£ The Evidence. €. The Déstaict Court Made Impernissible Credibility Deterninations., D,, Faéled To Consider The Rebetod Newky ; Discovered Evidence In Context With a The Erroneous Juay Instauction., € The Haamless-Ennon Findings Below Substantiatly Inpained ; Patitioner’s Right To Present A Complete Defense. F. The Effect Of The Eanoa In Relation To ALE Else That Happened. oo . G. The Sixth Cineuit Panel Did Not Conduct A Haanbess-Erron Reviaw.: : . OPINIONS 3°1.0w THE OPINION OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH ; CLRCUIT APPEARS AT