No. 19-5440

Lena McCollum v. Hubert Peterkin, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: accrual civil-procedure civil-rights concealment constitutional-rights due-process executive-knowledge illegal-entry law-enforcement procedural-violation search-and-seizure search-warrant standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the accrual date for a claim alleging illegal search and seizure is the date of execution for a defendant, who did not directly participate but was the proximate cause for the event, whose wrongdoing was concealed and inaccessible until a later time?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE ACCRual DATE FOR ACLATM ALLEGTWG TLLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1S THE ___ DATE OF EXECUTION FOR A DEFENDANT, WHD DID NAT DIRECTAY PARTECIPATE BUT WAS THE PROXEMATE CAUSE FOR THE EVENT, WHOSE WRONGDOING WAS CONCEALED AND UNACCESSTBLE UNTTL A LATER TIME ? AL. WHETHER THE ACCRUAL DATE FOR A CLATM NLLE NTRY AND SEARC DATE OF ENTRY RY THE POLICE FOR ARESTDENT HAVING NO KNOWLEDGE OF TTS EXECUTION UNTIL. A LATER PERTOD TN TIME ? _ a a

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-04
Waiver of right of respondents Hurbert Peterkin, Timothy Rugg, Timothy Kavanaugh & Hoke County to respond filed.
2019-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Hurbert Peterkin, Timothy Rugg, Timothy Kavanaugh & Hoke County
Bradley O. WoodWomble Bond Dickinson, LLP, Respondent
Bradley O. WoodWomble Bond Dickinson, LLP, Respondent
Lena McCollum
Lena McCollum — Petitioner
Lena McCollum — Petitioner