What if district court abused its discretion by not relying on the erroneous legal premise that a citizen(s) of the state of Louisiana and this great country deserves a fair trial by jury?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. What if district court abused its discretion by not relying on the erroneous legal ; premise that a citizen(s) of the state of Louisiana and this great country deserves a fair trial by jury? 2. Why couldn't evidence to be presented in a timely manner as stated in the constitution, would appellant and citizen(s) open to attacks, injuries, and other hateful actions brought on by Appellee(s) and others? 3. Assuming — if this Court of our country would have properly addressed this matter the outcome would have been resulted, by evidence presented to trail and jurors. In failing to properly comply with its own laws and rules of the United States of America appellant was force to file appeal. i PRESENTED ARGUMENT The conspiracy forming the basis of this lawsuit is factually intensive, Appellant, respectfully requests oral argument, this appeal will require the Court to interpret the law establishing limitations on a plaintiff's recovery against a liability insurer in a direct action of Appellee(s). This appeal also will require the Court to determine whether Louisiana laws imposes an evidentiary requirement were crimes committed, violated civil rights, voting rights by treason, imprisonment, sexual assaults, fraudulent uses government funds, law and medical malpractices and others to corrupt the justice system of Louisiana with the use of Louisiana Communication Services to enter evidence at trial in order to give proven liability to those who’s levels are not above the law. Oral argument may assist the Court in resolving these issues. ; ii . i}