No. 19-545

Jean Coulter v. Gerri Volchko Paulisick, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-10-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: circuit-conflict civil-procedure conflicting-decisions domicile due-process judicial-bias jurisdiction procedural-error standing third-circuit venue
Key Terms:
DueProcess Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Has the Third Circuit improperly determined that domicile of Plaintiff can be based exclusively on the determination of domicile in a subsequently filed case - conflicting with decisions of other Circuits?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented for Review 1. Has the Third Circuit improperly determined that domicile of Plaintiff can be based exclusively on the determination of domicile in a subsequently filed case conflicting with decisions of other Circuits? 2. Has the Third Circuit so far departed from accepted procedures to require This Court to exercise the court's supervisory powers as the Third Circuit has permitted Dismissal of both the Instant Matter (and the subsequently filed case) as the result of undue deference to clearly improper decisions by obviously biased jurists from the district court? 3. Was Due Process denied when domicile was decided (by a highly biased jurist) without notice? L (b) Parties in the Court Below Petitioner Jean Coulter Respondents Gerri Volchko Paulisick and Joseph R. Paulisick ©

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-02-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-11-18
Waiver of right of respondent Gerri Volchko Paulisick, et al. to respond filed.
2019-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2019)

Attorneys

Gerri Volchko Paulisick, et al.
Rhonda Jean SudinaRobb Leonard Mulvihill LLP, Respondent
Jean Coulter
Jean Coulter — Petitioner