Whether the government established the knowledge-of-status element under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In light of this Court’s recent decision in Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), should this Court grant certiorari, vacate the judgment of conviction, and remand to the United States Court of Appeals for further consideration where the government did not establish Petitioner’s knowledge of the “status element” of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), one of the two counts of conviction? 2. Does an anonymous tip providing minimal physical and location descriptors and alleging ongoing domestic violence that is not corroborated when police respond within minutes of the call suffice to support a stop and frisk based on “circumstances common to domestic violence calls”? 3. Whether the Third Circuit’s approach to determining that New Jersey’s second degree robbery statute is divisible is contrary to Mathis v. United States when it ignores state law sources and relies on the layout of the statute and the fact that different subsections require different proof? 1 PARTIES TO PROCEEDING The