No. 19-5460
Tags: 18-usc-924c categorical-approach court-of-appeals criminal-law criminal-procedure grant-vacate-remand residual-clause section-924c sentencing statutory-interpretation united-states-v-davis
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should grant, vacate, and remand Mr. Ortega's case in light of United States v. Davis
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court should grant, vacate, and remand Mr. Ortega’s case in light of United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), after the Court of Appeals held that it was “unnecessary” to apply the categorical approach to the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). prefix
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-16
Reply of petitioner Jose Ortega filed.
2019-10-07
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-08-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 7, 2019.
2019-08-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 6, 2019 to October 7, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Jose Ortega
Kara Lee Hartzler — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent