Anthony L. Pierce v. Lisa Garrett, et al.
Did the court erred in allowing the magistrate to use non-meritorious issues to dismiss petitioner's action without prejudice, barring appeal
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a yn tae, Core Ongogcae | l\ . Oe Did the courh erred in a\\svoing The. magistrate Jo use non -merrlous pssuels Jo" wien” dismiss prbilioner’s oclion without prejudice, barring appeal ; . did Yee cours erred in adopting dhe magistrates ndings ek pekcloner 3 Claims \o be Frivolous as a tide {oval w hece pobr i omer Mle b reme said moi shrale Srom overSta wy Wis case. over she wing such facts of Lhe unt > mai |~ room Supervisor Jomper ing and for Femoving lena\ document altons: Did We courk etred \elally 3 \ se w 4 dis teovairah na Ve Sucks presembech. ly pa Neves Showy Vow Tspondent 5 tolally Ais regard ed the Adwi visita We rehwve, which was Cover ed, ap by Vhe Unit Adiminishv ation and : Did the o | ) el _ court cred WW over looking Ve 0rima Jose sho wing oy "9 fen us \ “sy a Sail mechanism nen Place simgly \o rule Hoainst Pe Kona 5 Clam wher no such Se yo lous Vindings were made iv \he Pre Views two oc lions Yoled ond lor Hl court ruling al lowing peli ener Ly efile in stobe court ub never mention what shale court since, peli Mone hack eon borred Soe havi ng bean cibed Sov Le bor,