No. 19-5465
Isela Alejandra Campos v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court district-court-error guideline-range guidelines molina-martinez plain-error plain-error-review prejudice prejudice-standard sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the defendant may rely on the district court's error alone to show prejudice under plain error review
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW When the district court fails to calculate the Guideline range at sentencing, whether the defendant may rely on the district court’s error alone to show prejudice under plain error review when the “record is silent as to what the district court might have done had it considered the correct Guidelines range,” Molina-Martinez v. United States, 136 8. Ct. 13838, 1347 (2016) . prefix
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Isela Campos
Zandra Lopez — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
Zandra Lopez — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent