No. 19-5473
Samuel Benzant v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Tags: 28-usc-2253 appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-right constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-habeas-corpus habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment standard-of-review
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) on the basis that the Petitioner failed to state “a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” that jurists of reason would find “debatable.” il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2019)
2019-05-16
Application (18A1178) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until August 2, 2019.
2019-05-13
Application (18A1178) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 3, 2019 to August 2, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Samuel Benzant
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner