No. 19-5474
Terry Lee Carlson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: computer-search district-court due-process evidence evidence-suppression fourth-amendment jurisdiction search-limitation search-warrant territorial-jurisdiction venue warrant-scope
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment
FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals disregard plain and unambiguous language in the search warrant limiting searches to the computers located in the Eastern District of Virginia?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Did the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, when ruling on the validity of a search of a computer located in Minnesota conducted pursuant to a search warrant issued in Eastern District of Virginia, disregard plain and unambiguous language in that warrant limiting searches to the computers located in the Eastern District of Virginia? i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2019)
Attorneys
Terry Lee Carlson
Lee Richard Johnson — JOHNSON & GREENBERG PLLP, Petitioner
Lee Richard Johnson — JOHNSON & GREENBERG PLLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent