Mitchell Taebel v. Maricopa County Attorney's Office, et al.
Securities Immigration
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated
No question identified. : : | OL Aggurment Pemouded Coe Piledel the Cts aller Vee Cet pasenbed Fetal SOA trou b ConA fohireat vistltans and powersty | Csheenship Qlcsub arate $1252 45 AUS CIPIEC. 1 2) ithcter the Helicptel Video Fosfagt ank Pltetyo ts CLeooly Show tse oF Cyerss yr ane Vhecrssaty DPeoddy . Fate AS Gn Uhirasonable Siezare\n Vialfion HZ the Us, Const tion ond CATO pmerdin zat, Diheher the (rib Ay |?“ ose of The Const fetroua | Authe rly fe ale Ln 13 [Jab lic SaPodly: W) Wh ether Phe WEE trddarafs (eile lyase. abet cna Bo Amada Ceitle Celense. 5D Whether a etordand-has a POmaly hibtoe — 22L BeAr sentation od 46 Disclésate hyd co Sete See alse Farcdta, Cali fern er y US GIT O) \thedher Plat hes allghd Subfhtitif els. to. “Peo vilhe the apptaptiste HaChine Zolat orthe lngalty bhdeor GIVES!) Lok: Poe ote Volt yaas 7 5Ct Heck’, . Hain hiey, S1tus, ard) Carey Pi hed, 435US HUET) Ts AZ Poljt to allows evfe 2 60 Peftndants ‘exit abel it oy cds ly IS lind to \/alve. ecay Ty ba| Gia Cont nae. Defence Uith ous (CESS 0 ik Wiseten The Yyshol GheteS A A & . WD Whether heb Gnd the lnteostaPrstice. Cem pel irfonive Deh i A thes Wy Widest Beet econ ; ph fact , 0100 InneCenf— ubelS . ae “Suny yint GO een accpables . 7 ; |