No. 19-5475

Mitchell Taebel v. Maricopa County Attorney's Office, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-08-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process excessive-force fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment law-enforcement police-misconduct qualified-immunity standing unreasonable-seizure
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : : | OL Aggurment Pemouded Coe Piledel the Cts aller Vee Cet pasenbed Fetal SOA trou b ConA fohireat vistltans and powersty | Csheenship Qlcsub arate $1252 45 AUS CIPIEC. 1 2) ithcter the Helicptel Video Fosfagt ank Pltetyo ts CLeooly Show tse oF Cyerss yr ane Vhecrssaty DPeoddy . Fate AS Gn Uhirasonable Siezare\n Vialfion HZ the Us, Const tion ond CATO pmerdin zat, Diheher the (rib Ay |?“ ose of The Const fetroua | Authe rly fe ale Ln 13 [Jab lic SaPodly: W) Wh ether Phe WEE trddarafs (eile lyase. abet cna Bo Amada Ceitle Celense. 5D Whether a etordand-has a POmaly hibtoe — 22L BeAr sentation od 46 Disclésate hyd co Sete See alse Farcdta, Cali fern er y US GIT O) \thedher Plat hes allghd Subfhtitif els. to. “Peo vilhe the apptaptiste HaChine Zolat orthe lngalty bhdeor GIVES!) Lok: Poe ote Volt yaas 7 5Ct Heck’, . Hain hiey, S1tus, ard) Carey Pi hed, 435US HUET) Ts AZ Poljt to allows evfe 2 60 Peftndants ‘exit abel it oy cds ly IS lind to \/alve. ecay Ty ba| Gia Cont nae. Defence Uith ous (CESS 0 ik Wiseten The Yyshol GheteS A A & . WD Whether heb Gnd the lnteostaPrstice. Cem pel irfonive Deh i A thes Wy Widest Beet econ ; ph fact , 0100 InneCenf— ubelS . ae “Suny yint GO een accpables . 7 ; |

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-05
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Mitchell Taebel
Mitchell Taebel — Petitioner