No. 19-5475
Mitchell Taebel v. Maricopa County Attorney's Office, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process excessive-force fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment law-enforcement police-misconduct qualified-immunity standing unreasonable-seizure
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a Defendant has a primary Right of Self Representation and to Disclosure, by ithe Sat also Farottav California, Usi975)
whther plainif ha allSuc faot to Under $1983i for Dueproces Violations, see Heck (BEdd'215 Is.A2
-policy to allow cither the State or Defendants agalnst objections by this Defaudant to Walve dy in violation of The lutted States Constitution
)Whother Ast.II Cand theinter JusticeiCompell infunative relief against a clarly unla ation In Bod faritt
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-05
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2019)
Attorneys
Mitchell Taebel
Mitchell Taebel — Petitioner