No. 19-5478
Wilfredo Roy Madrigal v. United States
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: acca career-offender circuit-split controlled-substance-offense eleventh-circuit mens-rea sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-02-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a post-2002 conviction for sale of cocaine or possession with intent to sell cocaine in violation of Fla. Stat. § 893.13 a 'controlled substance offense' as defined in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b)
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Is a post-2002 conviction for sale of cocaine or possession with intent to sell cocaine in violation of Fla. Stat. § 893.13 a “controlled substance offense” as defined in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b) if, according to the Florida legislature, the state need not prove that the defendant “knew the illicit nature of the substance” he sold or possessed with intent to sell? i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2019-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-05
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2019-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2019)
Attorneys
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Wilfredo Roy Madrigal
Peter Vincent Birch — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Peter Vincent Birch — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner