No. 19-5486
Jarrell Williams v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: age-of-defendant constitutional-provisions criminal-prosecution district-court-jurisdiction due-process federal-juvenile-delinquency-act ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jurisdiction juvenile juvenile-delinquency juvenile-offenders rico rico-conspiracy
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act divest the district court of jurisdiction over the petitioner's prosecution?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Did the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act ("JDA"), 18 U.S.C. SS 5031-42, divested the district court of jurisdiction over Petitioner's prosecution for the charged RICO conspiracy because he was a juvenileunder eighteen years old at the time he allegedly committed the charged crime? Ey 2.) Was Counsel Ineffective For Not Raising The Argument That ' Petitioner Was A Juvenile At The Time Of The Crimes, And Could Not Be Charged As An Adult For Crimes Committed As A Juvenile?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent