Whether Mr. Iskander's constitutional rights were violated when he was denied the opportunity to testify with new information and knowledge about his case

QUESTIONS PRESENTED \ |} SSS 3 4 | MR. ISKANDER WAS RELEASED FROM PRISON ON FEBRUARY 3, 2018 AFTER 5 SERVING SIXTEEN YEARS (INCLUDING 2 CONCORDANT TO 6 6 CONCORDANT YEARS WITHOUT SUBSTRACTION FOR CREDIT) 7 | MR.ISKANDER IS 84 YEARS OLD NOW AND WAS NEVER TESTIFIED AND 8 "WAS PRAYING FOR GRANTED PETITION TO TESTIFY WITH 9 NEW INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE OF HIS CASE.THIS CURRENT 10 APPEAL IS ALSO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING LATE FEDERAL ul COURT ORDERS DETAILED AS FOLLOWED. 2 CASE NO, 18-70230 DATE FILED MAY 21. 2018 13 BEFORE: THOMAS, CHIEF JUDGE, W. FLETCHER 4 AND CALLAHAN, CIRCUIT JUDGES. , 15 DENIED AND JUDGMENT OF PETITION 16 CASE NO. 18-70321 DATE FILED SEP 20 2018 17 | BEFORE: HONORABLE LEAVY, HAWKINS, AND TALLMAN, CIRCUIT JUDGES. | 18 AMENDED APPEAL ISSUES WERE ORDERED 19 (IN SPITE I WAS USING NEW LEGAL RULES. RULES 59 (E) MOTION TO | 20 AMEND JUDGMENT AND RULES 60 (B) (3) RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT | 21 . OR ORDER.) | 22 3 , CASE NO. 18-56639 DATE FILED MAR 152019. , “4 BEFORE: CANBY AND WARDLAW, CIRCUIT JUDGES. 0 THE ISSUE THAT WAS JUDGED WAS THE APPEALABILITY CREDIT ISSUE AND THE DENIAL OF PROOF OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND 26 NEVER JUDGED MY LATEST APPEALS WHICH PROVIDES NEW 27 INFORMATION ON MY ORIGINAL CASE REFERENCED ABOVE : 28 ay ,