Whether petitioner's civil rights were violated when his in forma pauperis application was denied, resulting in the dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Lepftoner has acl three (3) plus fws 42, U5-¢. 57939 Lil Actions Aovaissed yndev He 3 styikes Provision if av 5.691915 C4), Jotest 12 U.3.C. F/983 byas nor Aismpssed lar Failure to sfote a Claina por cll Acton held ws Merit, cui) Athlen 1/es dismissed because fetitioner Could fot pry % 8400.00 Filing Fee 11 the. LS, D) SHCH Court foritiouer peak His ofevsta) ia the SH Greulft Court of Ayes they Wauted Penh oey to fs 4 BIOS, 00 Ky pela Fee. fottHoury Las braraly gssay fled anil Sulfered Q broker Mase, & Erectuped Jower Jeff eye Socket, Qa haze JaceraHor absve his JeFt eye , extreme Swelling and brusms of The Lace (Ws L/as Aan gssaulf ordered by a Corpectiazal spauff Member beCause fi titioner reported +My Covyectava) staff Medewmbev Shug glsag huye ameouvrer of drugs, Pebeces, Celt prenes, cell phoue Chargers aero 4 ottiey Coirtyafand , ) fPetfione has been brutally assaulted due te his Sexual O+/enfatoy CBi-Sexy al), fitihor has filed an Ghidauit Stahivig hus Lr. 25 WO (mmenieat danger aS fous as he IS housed af fhes po" Pecify, SH! OY. CH. cb Nygeds hos denied pexhoners Moret pauperis hue Fe WS inabiiity fo Vag fiby ke, appellate hee, Can the SH Civ, legally do this 7 ( 87