No. 19-5501
Mandrail Jamar Woodberry v. United States
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure counsel-withdrawal criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process fourth-circuit jurisdiction rehaif rehaif-decision rehaif-v-united-states statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review withdrawal-of-counsel
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether in light of the Court's opinion in Rehaif v. United States, No. 17-9560 issued on June 21, 2019 this Court should vacate the opinion of the U.S Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and remand to the court for further proceedings in light of Rehaif—despite the fact Appellant Counsel withdrew from Defendant appellant direct appeal process
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court should vacate the opinion of the 4th Circuit and remand for further proceedings in light of Rehaif v. United States
Docket Entries
2019-12-16
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-11-12
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 588 U. S. ___ (2019).
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-07
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2019-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 7, 2019.
2019-08-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 6, 2019 to October 7, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Mandrail Jamar Woodberry
Mandrail Jamar Woodberry — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel John Francisco — Jones Day, Respondent