Patricia Gill v. Mercy College, et al.
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether the prosecutions undertaken by state officials were in bad faith with the intent to harass the defendant/Plaintiff and discourage her from exercising her federal constitutional rights
ESTION(S) PRESENTE Plaintiff does not feel that the court of appeals decision does not reflect the whole truth in this case. The appeals decision states that Plaintiff is « without merit. Plaintiff feels that Judge Nelson S. Roman heard this case in it’s entirely, he did not dismiss this case of lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and Instead Judge Roman suggested that defendant contact plaintiff to come to some resolution in this case, and additions to this Judge Roman instructed Plaintiff to seek help for her case at the pro se office, either at white plans or at the Manhattan office. Judge Roman’s action in this case holds merits. Plaintiff feels that Judge Nelson S. Roman acted in Bad faith when he spoke about this case in the Nyack College case. She was only informed that hearing would be about Nyack College issues. Plaintiff feels that she is being ostracize for speaking out for herself. ' The prosecutions undertaken by state officials in bad faith with the intent to harass the defendant/Plaintiff and discourage her from exercising her federal constitutional rights.