Robert Hill v. Dave Jassen, et al.
Whether the dismissal of a civil case by a district court for lack of jurisdiction over an incarcerated petitioner violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment
No question identified. : ; ‘ y) . 7 wrerd Ot ea HE PS IL? ANF) LL . %7)) be ovu my a? Lwyf woe ge of my FF my le Prag Jeov S10 ry yw Fo DP 2 wy ahopwmv2 Vrow —LYyoada¢ 2 20 JfyIwSe 49 Apes Wh SePrpow fo rtrd oy ~}) L > /), ‘) swore}, aA Wsf Ae Art} FF TIS} Fou _— PRAM {vero by W092 24 4) RIG 297 ¢=9 “p2poes]. hyo5 4 srs IVANIO sn J S422 prva ~ gypwe|d FF A gaenoew wy +9 5 ao ek ad faery 4h se seY were wy ataymvy rAayp'p > 20 “RP weg? ap Se hey reas my w Yr)? +} he PR paler} ow Lia\wrv nos (9) 22 2602 yp IWS Pre FATD APH IG (v Pe Cy Lerz 9m Fa eM (OL UY) (hy ad 2d Vly Sor “pad 4° arevnyrbyrr sho Lyant ap 49 myev VAG pow ao ley} @j707 94 ‘prmeby en pad 23 Rv? ’ pape nopwr 40) FWILSIGN ~N ve Sage) para w Syp'p m2] a ot PA) 49) WI wl | G3LNAS3ud (S)NOILSANO ae both, giving mcerceeteds gys se CNA it i30-f5 ne ee meno by ditmrtsg a cose aailoy Sutplemetaez mebryrel predee Llp ited by fh clk; of fle weftterm sf ~ | ‘Ft Hl)" ene | = " Fl re U645)" eed , wo " ZF USC. LleqG)' 7% . 3.8) st BA is “ges | shouis fh feets sf Tle chove. Cols # Stetete be melead? : 4. A) Does th Federer sf « Orstricf Cowt srde Lismesiing a Cord Cofe whe sp of ih pe tres fF ae nCercereled per fe Utigekd of fhe tue af fle pecoyt of peek srliey 9 gic ne tie fF tle aps ace ff acter Fetah RE YG) ox 24 USC. 2/07) ponsthtile a vir lebow of th On 0rcesr Clem s& oh Praha peek th US Cothhde? HB) DE A is “yes” GS suck x Umlediem 5 Kiccenk t= pr cth "Pe titrne Hal fle relate of cue ferning FLe Cougs of Rypels® ode of . (tM B PT es ppekr my Cuy'S wehbe L Gmnt 0t7 7 |