No. 19-5522
Berson Marius v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process factual-proffer ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-conduct judicial-fact-finding plea-bargaining rule-11
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court judge can elicit additional facts during a factual proffer
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE CAN ELICITE ‘ ADDITIONAL FACTS DURING A FACTUAL PROFFER, AND WHETHER COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR FAILING TO OBJECT WHEN THE COURT ELICITED ADDITIONALFACTS DURING A FACTUAL PROFFER WHETHER A VIOLATION OF RULE 11 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ELICITED ADDITIONAL FACTS DURING THE FACTUAL PROFFER i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent