No. 19-5537
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment appellate-review constitutional-provisions constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-defects-indictment due-process indictment jurisdiction motion-to-close motion-to-quash sixth-amendment trial-court
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Trial Court err when it overruled Appellants Motion to Quash the Amended Indictment?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Did +he Trial Court ere When it overcvoled Agdellants Motion to Quash the Amencled tadictmevt ae CTA 2b 32s DANDY, . 2. Did the Court of Appeals ace by not Ihandtng down Aw Witten OPinion on Apyellants Motion to Quash Tne Amended ncdictment.? 3 Es & Motion to Qoaush the indict ment a pPropec Vehicle for alerting the trial Court of defects on fuze of indictments? 4. Did the trial Covet Violate defendants United state's Constitutional Aight. Amendment vi.P §. Did the trial court Violate detendunts \44th Amend: LS. CONST. Doe Process of Law by deniaing Petitioners Moten tb Quacsh ? .
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)