No. 19-5543
Arnold Maurice Mathis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability fourth-amendment independent-source-doctrine ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment warrantless-search
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether trial counsel was ineffective in violation of the Sixth Amendment by failing to investigate and litigate a warrantless search of petitioner's cell phone that preceded the issuance of a warrant and which was not disclosed in the application for that warrant, and which thus violated the Fourth Amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trial counsel was ineffective in violation of the Sixth Amendment
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Arnold Mathis
Matthew P. Farmer — Farmer & Fitzgerald, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent