Whether the federal detainer deprived the petitioner of his liberty interest in posting a set probation bail on January 22, 2008

QUESTION FOR REVIEW | | 1.) Whether Petitioner stated a Valid Constitutional Claim when he asserted that on January 22,2008,the federal detainer deprived him of his liberty Interest In posting a set probation pail[when] the “féderal Government tock him a way from the state custody and place him In for federal prosecution for five(5)months. 2.) Whether[when]a federal sentencing judge Remain silent on how.a sentence should run and the petitioner Request for time served In a state jail or state prison to be credited toward his federal sentence from october 18,2007,the date the : state arrested on the state offenses through up until march 26,2014, the date he . entered the federal detainer[a]lone on january 22,2008, ; prevented the petitioner release from state confinement[did]the Eleventh Circuit : -Violate.HEGNEY V. HOLDER.177 fed. App'x 901(1ith Cir 2006 U.S.App.Lexis 10148) ; an SHAW V. SMITH 680 £.2d 1104(5th Cir.1982 U.S.App-Lexis 17167) ,When it failed to : [grant] the Requested jail credit toward the petitioner's federal sentence. 3.) Whether the Eleventh Circuit Violated HEGNEY V. HOLDER 177: fed. App'x 901(11th cir. 2006 U.S.App. Lexis 10148 jan SHAW V.SMITH 680 £:2d 1104(lith Cir.1982 U.S.App. ) Lexis 17167),When it failed to Reinstate petitioner Appeal. based on the federal detainer[a]lone prevented the state from releasing the petitioner on bail. . iL